Arguments, Dialogue, and Negotiation
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the past few years there have been a number of proposals for mechanisms for negotiation between agents that make use of argumentation. These proposals have largely been vague on the subject of how the generation and interpretation of arguments fits into the process of negotiation. This paper addresses this gap, proposing a particular protocol which is suitable for negotiation, and illustrating its use on an example from the literature.
منابع مشابه
Persuasive Negotiation Dialogues using Rhetorical Arguments (Doctoral Consortium)
In persuasive negotiation dialogues, agents, with different interests and goals, exchange proposals that are supported by rhetorical arguments such as threats, rewards, or appeals. The aim of this thesis is to investigate such dialogue systems, where agents can generate rhetorical arguments in order to try to persuade their opponents, and can also construct counter-arguments, which depend on th...
متن کاملKnowledge as Arguments for Facilitating E-commerce Dialogue
In this paper we present our ideas on using generic arguments as a means of representing the shared knowledge that an agent community has. In this approach each agent’s beliefs are represented by actual arguments. Because these actual arguments are drawn from a common generic tree, negotiation between agents can be simplified. The mapping between the negotiation protocol, the negotiation object...
متن کاملReinforcement Learning of Two-Issue Negotiation Dialogue Policies
We use hand-crafted simulated negotiators (SNs) to train and evaluate dialogue policies for two-issue negotiation between two agents. These SNs differ in their goals and in the use of strong and weak arguments to persuade their counterparts. They may also make irrational moves, i.e., moves not consistent with their goals, to generate a variety of negotiation patterns. Different versions of thes...
متن کاملArguments and Artifacts for Dispute Resolution
In a social context cultural differences, individual interests, and partial awareness are often the causes of disputes. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is usually considered to be alternative to litigation, and can also be used to allow disputing parts to find an agreement. A dispute resolution is not an easy task and usually involves more entities including mediator or arbitrator with mul...
متن کاملArgumentation-based Negotiation in t-DeLP-POP
In this contribution, we propose to model argumentation-based negotiation in terms of t-DeLP-POP, a partial order planning system that incorporates temporal defeasible logic. This logic combines temporal facts and durative rules into temporal arguments. We propose a dialogue protocol for the negotiation of plans in this planning system that models a variety of scenarios for argumentative negoti...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000